From: The adult and pediatric palliative care: differences and shared issues
Intervention | Aim |
---|---|
·Earlier referral to PC service | ·Early detection of needs and planning of appropriate therapies |
·Simultaneity with disease-specific treatment | ·Reassuring the patient on continuity of care ·Better coping with cumbersome/painful but potentially curative treatments ·Better definition of prognosis in complicated cases ·Some specific treatments may retain a palliative role in late stages (e.g. radiotherapy) |
·Integration of PC service with community (e.g., schools, workplace, religious community) | ·Prevention of social isolation ·Preserving social, working or family role of the patient ·Community, “lay” caregivers may integrate medical-centered PC service |
·A dynamic network of PC | ·May consent a better matching of time-changing needs of patients during the course of complicated diseases ·May help patients with “break-through” symptoms to gain new stability and coming back home |
·Respite care | ·It can help families to cope with cumbersome situations ·Increases the chance of patients with difficult symptoms to be managed at home |